IVAL vs. MOOD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVAL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVAL returned 18.08%/yr vs 19.14%/yr for MOOD. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVAL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MOOD.

Performance

IVAL vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than MOOD's 13.27% return.

IVAL

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: 4.21%
• 6M: 9.40%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 1Y: 34.16%
• 3Y*: 18.08%
• 5Y*: 9.92%
• 10Y*: 8.16%
• ALL TIME*: 6.66%

MOOD

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 5.83%
• YTD: 13.27%
• 1Y: 32.12%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	$389.83K	$422.74K	$617.49K
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	$594.91K	$566.29K	$735.34K

IVAL vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	16.85%	34.92%	-0.71%	20.61%	-4.23%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	13.27%	30.39%	12.53%	12.56%	-3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and MOOD is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.72

The correlation between IVAL and MOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVAL vs. MOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVAL	MOOD
Industrials	22.0%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	21.7%	9.0%
Basic Materials	17.9%	5.9%
Energy	14.2%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	10.2%	4.4%
Technology	6.1%	33.5%
Healthcare	4.1%	9.0%
Communication Services	4.0%	8.6%
Financial Services	-	12.4%
Real Estate	-	2.1%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

IVAL vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVAL

IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 86
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 84
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVAL vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVAL	MOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.14	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.57	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	3.23	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	9.79	+0.46

IVAL vs. MOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the MOOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and MOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and MOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVAL	MOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.09%	-14.34%	-31.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.24%	-9.71%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.92%	-9.71%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-2.08%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.88%	-2.30%	-9.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	3.20%	+0.24%

Volatility

IVAL vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 2.45%. This indicates that IVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVAL	MOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.97%	2.45%	+2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.96%	12.23%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.53%	14.69%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.78%	12.09%	+5.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.61%	12.09%	+6.52%

IVAL vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVAL vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than MOOD's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	2.61%	2.75%	3.60%	5.15%	8.00%	3.95%	2.07%	2.51%	2.93%	1.73%	2.02%	1.86%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.36%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVAL and MOOD in my portfolio?

IVAL and MOOD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVAL or MOOD?

IVAL has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to MOOD (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs MOOD's -14.34%.

Which ETF is better, IVAL or MOOD?

On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 19.14% vs 18.08% for IVAL. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVAL or MOOD?

Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 18.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVAL or MOOD?

IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVAL or MOOD?

IVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.

What is the main difference between IVAL and MOOD?

IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.73% for MOOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.