IVAL vs. FID
IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IVAL is actively managed, while FID is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVAL returned 8.36%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVAL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
IVAL vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.
IVAL
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
IVAL vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 13.29% | 34.92% | -0.71% | 20.61% | -10.06% | -0.22% | -4.94% | 21.26% | -18.61% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVAL and FID is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IVAL and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVAL vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVAL
FID
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
IVAL
FID
Consumer Cyclical
IVAL
FID
Basic Materials
IVAL
FID
Energy
IVAL
FID
Consumer Defensive
IVAL
FID
Technology
IVAL
FID
Communication Services
IVAL
FID
Healthcare
IVAL
FID
Financial Services
IVAL
-
FID
Real Estate
IVAL
-
FID
Utilities
IVAL
-
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVAL vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
IVAL
FID
IVAL vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVAL | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 2.30 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 3.26 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.62 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 9.14 | +1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVAL | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.30 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.46 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.39 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
IVAL vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVAL | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.09% | -39.79% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.24% | -8.93% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | -10.97% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | -29.13% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -1.11% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -8.47% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.55% | +0.63% |
Volatility
IVAL vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that IVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVAL | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 3.00% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 8.12% | +3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 10.16% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 17.04% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 18.96% | -0.12% |
IVAL vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVAL vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 2.66% | 2.75% | 3.60% | 5.15% | 8.00% | 3.95% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 1.73% | 2.02% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVAL and FID have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVAL has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, IVAL leads with 8.36% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVAL has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.66% for IVAL.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVAL and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer