PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVAL vs. EEMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVAL vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 16.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IVAL has outperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 8.51%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.64% annualized return.


IVAL

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.02%
1Y
26.22%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
8.51%

EEMV

1D
-0.74%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
16.72%
6M
15.97%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
6.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVAL vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
10.35%34.92%-0.71%20.61%-10.06%-0.22%-4.94%21.26%-22.50%31.03%
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
16.72%13.45%7.98%7.75%-13.94%5.05%6.90%7.83%-5.81%27.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and EEMV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014

0.65

The correlation between IVAL and EEMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVAL vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVAL
EEMV

Industrials

28.1%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

26.3%
6.2%

Basic Materials

12.0%
2.9%

Energy

9.9%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
5.6%

Communication Services

7.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.4%

Technology

4.0%
36.5%

Financial Services

-

18.0%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

4.4%

Industrials

IVAL
28.1%
EEMV
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IVAL
26.3%
EEMV
6.2%

Basic Materials

IVAL
12.0%
EEMV
2.9%

Energy

IVAL
9.9%
EEMV
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

IVAL
7.9%
EEMV
5.6%

Communication Services

IVAL
7.8%
EEMV
10.1%

Healthcare

IVAL
4.2%
EEMV
5.4%

Technology

IVAL
4.0%
EEMV
36.5%

Financial Services

IVAL

-

EEMV
18.0%

Real Estate

IVAL

-

EEMV
0.6%

Utilities

IVAL

-

EEMV
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVAL vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVAL
IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVAL vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVALEEMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.28

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

8.09

+0.21

IVAL vs. EEMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the EEMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and EEMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and EEMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVALEEMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.09%

-31.56%

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-9.22%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-12.47%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-21.90%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

-31.56%

-14.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.45%

-3.69%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.95%

-7.95%

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.59%

+0.75%

Volatility

IVAL vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) is 4.11%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that IVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVALEEMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

8.51%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

14.18%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.60%

15.20%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

12.36%

+5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.63%

13.97%

+4.66%

IVAL vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVAL vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than EEMV's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
2.19%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
1.58%2.75%3.60%5.15%8.00%3.95%2.07%2.51%2.93%1.73%2.02%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVAL and EEMV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMV has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to IVAL (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs EEMV's -31.56%.

On 10-year performance, IVAL leads with 8.51% vs 6.64% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVAL has performed better with a 8.51% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IVAL.

EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.58% for IVAL.

IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EEMV is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.25% for EEMV.

IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVAL and EEMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer