IVAL vs. AAVM
IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) and AAVM (Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVAL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while AAVM is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVAL returned 9.92%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for AAVM. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVAL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AAVM.
Performance
IVAL vs. AAVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than AAVM's 13.65% return.
IVAL
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 34.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.66%
AAVM
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.44K | $51.51K | $70.29K | |
| $389.83K | $422.74K | $617.49K |
IVAL vs. AAVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 16.85% | 34.92% | -0.71% | 20.61% | -10.06% | -0.22% | -4.94% | 21.26% | -22.50% | 12.32% |
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF | 13.65% | 18.54% | 12.07% | -0.74% | -7.00% | 3.52% | 4.69% | 4.59% | -15.64% | 14.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVAL and AAVM is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IVAL and AAVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVAL vs. AAVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVAL
AAVM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
IVAL
AAVM
Consumer Cyclical
IVAL
AAVM
Basic Materials
IVAL
AAVM
Energy
IVAL
AAVM
Consumer Defensive
IVAL
AAVM
Technology
IVAL
AAVM
Healthcare
IVAL
AAVM
Communication Services
IVAL
AAVM
Financial Services
IVAL
-
AAVM
Real Estate
IVAL
-
AAVM
Utilities
IVAL
-
AAVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVAL vs. AAVM — Risk / Return Rank
IVAL
AAVM
IVAL vs. AAVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVAL | AAVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.32 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 2.61 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | 9.78 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVAL vs. AAVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than AAVM's maximum drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and AAVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVAL | AAVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.09% | -34.71% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.24% | -10.85% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | -20.23% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.51% | -23.73% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -3.64% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.88% | -13.14% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 2.90% | +0.54% |
Volatility
IVAL vs. AAVM - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) at 4.03%. This indicates that IVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVAL | AAVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 4.03% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 13.94% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 16.15% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 15.74% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 14.94% | +3.67% |
IVAL vs. AAVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AAVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVAL vs. AAVM - Dividend Comparison
IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than AAVM's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF | 1.81% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 2.61% | 2.75% | 3.60% | 5.15% | 8.00% | 3.95% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 1.73% | 2.02% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVAL and AAVM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVAL has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to AAVM (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs AAVM's -34.71%.
On 5-year performance, IVAL leads with 9.92% vs 6.37% for AAVM. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, AAVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVAL has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AAVM.
IVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.81% for AAVM.
IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AAVM is Multi-factor. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.45% for AAVM.
IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVAL and AAVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer