PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVAL vs. AAVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVAL vs. AAVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than AAVM's 13.65% return.


IVAL

1D
-2.03%
1M
4.21%
6M
9.40%
YTD
16.85%
1Y
34.16%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
8.16%
ALL TIME*
6.66%

AAVM

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.23%
6M
6.63%
YTD
13.65%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$67.44K$51.51K$70.29K
$389.83K$422.74K$617.49K

IVAL vs. AAVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
16.85%34.92%-0.71%20.61%-10.06%-0.22%-4.94%21.26%-22.50%12.32%
AAVM
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
13.65%18.54%12.07%-0.74%-7.00%3.52%4.69%4.59%-15.64%14.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and AAVM is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.70

The correlation between IVAL and AAVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVAL vs. AAVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVAL
AAVM

Industrials

22.0%
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

21.7%
11.6%

Basic Materials

17.9%
12.5%

Energy

14.2%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.2%
4.0%

Technology

6.1%
15.4%

Healthcare

4.1%
8.7%

Communication Services

4.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

-

1.8%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Industrials

IVAL
22.0%
AAVM
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IVAL
21.7%
AAVM
11.6%

Basic Materials

IVAL
17.9%
AAVM
12.5%

Energy

IVAL
14.2%
AAVM
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVAL
10.2%
AAVM
4.0%

Technology

IVAL
6.1%
AAVM
15.4%

Healthcare

IVAL
4.1%
AAVM
8.7%

Communication Services

IVAL
4.0%
AAVM
4.6%

Financial Services

IVAL

-

AAVM
1.8%

Real Estate

IVAL

-

AAVM
0.6%

Utilities

IVAL

-

AAVM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVAL vs. AAVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVAL
IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AAVM
AAVM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AAVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AAVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVAL vs. AAVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVALAAVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.32

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.61

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

9.78

+0.47

IVAL vs. AAVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the AAVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and AAVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. AAVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than AAVM's maximum drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and AAVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVALAAVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.09%

-34.71%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-10.85%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-20.23%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.51%

-23.73%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-3.64%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.88%

-13.14%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.90%

+0.54%

Volatility

IVAL vs. AAVM - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) at 4.03%. This indicates that IVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVALAAVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

4.03%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

13.94%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

16.15%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

15.74%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

14.94%

+3.67%

IVAL vs. AAVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AAVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVAL vs. AAVM - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than AAVM's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAVM
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
1.81%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%0.00%0.00%
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
2.61%2.75%3.60%5.15%8.00%3.95%2.07%2.51%2.93%1.73%2.02%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVAL and AAVM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVAL has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to AAVM (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs AAVM's -34.71%.

On 5-year performance, IVAL leads with 9.92% vs 6.37% for AAVM. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, AAVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVAL has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AAVM.

IVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.81% for AAVM.

IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AAVM is Multi-factor. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.45% for AAVM.

IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVAL and AAVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer