IUSV vs. ROE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. IUSV is passively managed, while ROE is actively managed. Over the past year, IUSV returned 21.39% vs 39.77% for ROE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.

Performance

IUSV vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 21.93% return.

IUSV

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 21.39%
• 3Y*: 15.27%
• 5Y*: 11.26%
• 10Y*: 12.35%

ROE

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 21.93%
• 6M: 20.40%
• 1Y: 39.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSV vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	8.10%	12.85%	12.18%	5.18%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	21.93%	17.20%	18.34%	4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and ROE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023	0.83

The correlation between IUSV and ROE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSV vs. ROE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUSV	ROE
Technology	21.7%	40.3%
Financial Services	14.9%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	8.9%
Healthcare	11.1%	8.1%
Industrials	10.9%	8.7%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	4.3%
Energy	7.0%	3.3%
Utilities	4.3%	2.0%
Real Estate	3.7%	1.8%
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.7%
Communication Services	3.0%	10.4%

Return for Risk

IUSV vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSV

IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 68
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 71

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 86
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSV vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IUSV	ROE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.72	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	3.60	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.48	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	4.62	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.86	20.37	-7.51

IUSV vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the ROE Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and ROE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, which is greater than ROE's maximum drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and ROE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUSV	ROE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.88%	-19.10%	-37.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.36%	-8.66%	+2.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	0.00%	-0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.28%	-2.57%	-3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	1.96%	-0.29%

Volatility

IUSV vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 3.00%, while Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUSV	ROE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	5.91%	-2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.45%	11.54%	-4.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.12%	14.69%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	15.95%	-1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.08%	15.95%	+1.13%

IUSV vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUSV vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than ROE's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	1.70%	1.78%	2.15%	1.75%	2.22%	1.87%	2.40%	2.19%	2.67%	1.93%	4.44%	7.63%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	0.93%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUSV and ROE in my portfolio?

IUSV and ROE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IUSV or ROE?

ROE has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to IUSV (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs ROE's -19.10%.

Which ETF is better, IUSV or ROE?

On 1-year performance, ROE leads with 39.77% vs 21.39% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IUSV or ROE?

Over the 1-year period, ROE has performed better with a 39.77% return vs 21.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUSV or ROE?

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IUSV or ROE?

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.93% for ROE.

What is the main difference between IUSV and ROE?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.49% for ROE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.