IUSV vs. EWO
IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) and EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index, while EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSV returned 11.73%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for EWO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWO.
Performance
IUSV vs. EWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than EWO's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed EWO with an annualized return of 11.73%, while EWO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.
IUSV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
EWO
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 17.72%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 43.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.36%
- 5Y*
- 17.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
IUSV vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 9.97% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | -5.40% | 25.22% | 1.56% | 31.47% | -9.21% | 15.09% |
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 20.31% | 74.21% | 4.05% | 20.63% | -21.95% | 31.50% | -3.67% | 17.05% | -22.88% | 52.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSV and EWO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2000 | 0.57 |
The correlation between IUSV and EWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUSV vs. EWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSV
EWO
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Technology
IUSV
EWO
Financial Services
IUSV
EWO
Consumer Cyclical
IUSV
EWO
Healthcare
IUSV
EWO
-
Industrials
IUSV
EWO
Consumer Defensive
IUSV
EWO
-
Energy
IUSV
EWO
Utilities
IUSV
EWO
Real Estate
IUSV
EWO
Basic Materials
IUSV
EWO
Communication Services
IUSV
EWO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSV vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank
IUSV
EWO
IUSV vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSV | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.12 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 10.48 | +0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSV vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and EWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSV | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -75.69% | +18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | -14.08% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -16.75% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.95% | -41.82% | +23.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | -58.10% | +20.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -3.06% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -28.03% | +21.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 4.18% | -2.51% |
Volatility
IUSV vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 2.58%, while iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSV | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 7.39% | -4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 16.64% | -9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 19.55% | -9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 22.00% | -7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 22.56% | -5.58% |
IUSV vs. EWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than EWO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSV vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison
IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than EWO's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 2.01% | 2.38% | 7.40% | 5.66% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% |
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSV and EWO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to IUSV (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs EWO's -75.69%.
On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 14.90% vs 11.73% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.90% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWO.
EWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.67% for IUSV.
IUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EWO is Europe Equities. IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.49% for EWO.
EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSV and EWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer