IUSG vs. VTV
IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Growth Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSG returned 17.63%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for VTV. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
IUSG vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 17.63%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.78% annualized return.
IUSG
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 29.29%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 17.63%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
IUSG vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 10.18% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 27.02% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.29% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and VTV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IUSG and VTV has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IUSG vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSG
VTV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IUSG
VTV
Communication Services
IUSG
VTV
Financial Services
IUSG
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
IUSG
VTV
Industrials
IUSG
VTV
Healthcare
IUSG
VTV
Utilities
IUSG
VTV
Consumer Defensive
IUSG
VTV
Real Estate
IUSG
VTV
Basic Materials
IUSG
VTV
Energy
IUSG
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSG vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
IUSG
VTV
IUSG vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSG | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 4.25 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 16.04 | -7.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSG | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -59.27% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -6.35% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -14.52% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.21% | -17.04% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.35% | -36.78% | +4.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | 0.00% | -4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.42% | -7.86% | -13.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 1.68% | +1.48% |
Volatility
IUSG vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.34%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSG | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 3.34% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.25% | 7.82% | +5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 10.38% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 13.92% | +7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 16.68% | +3.78% |
IUSG vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUSG and VTV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSG vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than VTV's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSG and VTV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IUSG has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.63% vs 12.78% for VTV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.63% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG and VTV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.
IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSG and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer