IUSG vs. NACP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IUSG tracks the S&P 900 Growth Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSG returned 13.77%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.

Performance

IUSG vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 20.21% return.

IUSG

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -1.86%
• YTD: 9.19%
• 6M: 7.87%
• 1Y: 26.96%
• 3Y*: 25.00%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: 17.77%

NACP

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 20.21%
• 6M: 17.87%
• 1Y: 39.41%
• 3Y*: 25.74%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	9.19%	21.23%	34.70%	29.28%	-28.81%	31.26%	32.65%	30.62%	-11.25%
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	20.21%	21.38%	23.93%	29.69%	-23.05%	27.62%	26.00%	30.74%	-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and NACP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018	0.89

The correlation between IUSG and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSG vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUSG	NACP
Technology	50.8%	41.3%
Communication Services	15.2%	9.0%
Financial Services	8.7%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.9%
Industrials	6.6%	8.0%
Healthcare	6.4%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	3.1%
Utilities	1.1%	3.0%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.1%
Basic Materials	0.5%	1.4%
Energy	0.3%	4.3%

Return for Risk

IUSG vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG

IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 47
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

NACP

NACP Risk / Return Rank: 84
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IUSG	NACP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.60	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.39	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.45	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	4.10	-2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.45	17.54	-9.09

IUSG vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and NACP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUSG	NACP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.41%	-30.96%	-32.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.07%	-9.65%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.28%	-19.66%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.21%	-27.89%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.23%	-2.27%	-2.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.40%	-5.72%	-15.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	2.25%	+0.95%

Volatility

IUSG vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) have volatilities of 7.16% and 6.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUSG	NACP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	6.98%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.66%	12.73%	+0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.92%	15.25%	+1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	17.69%	+3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.48%	18.77%	+1.71%

IUSG vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUSG vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than NACP's 0.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	0.50%	0.53%	0.59%	1.12%	1.07%	0.59%	0.93%	1.64%	1.32%	1.28%	1.48%	1.29%
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	0.56%	0.62%	2.96%	1.28%	3.48%	3.06%	1.48%	1.22%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUSG and NACP in my portfolio?

IUSG and NACP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IUSG or NACP?

IUSG has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to NACP (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs NACP's -30.96%.

Which ETF is better, IUSG or NACP?

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.31% vs 13.77% for IUSG. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, NACP has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IUSG or NACP?

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 13.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUSG or NACP?

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IUSG or NACP?

NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.50% for IUSG.

What is the main difference between IUSG and NACP?

IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.49% for NACP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.