IUSG vs. ILCG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG).
IUSG and ILCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. ILCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both IUSG and ILCG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUSG or ILCG.
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and ILCG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IUSG vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IUSG:
2.21
ILCG:
2.09
IUSG:
2.84
ILCG:
2.70
IUSG:
1.40
ILCG:
1.38
IUSG:
3.04
ILCG:
2.86
IUSG:
12.09
ILCG:
11.52
IUSG:
3.15%
ILCG:
3.18%
IUSG:
17.25%
ILCG:
17.55%
IUSG:
-63.35%
ILCG:
-52.98%
IUSG:
-2.55%
ILCG:
-2.78%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUSG having a 36.32% return and ILCG slightly lower at 34.88%. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 14.96%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.71% annualized return.
IUSG
36.32%
3.10%
11.17%
36.58%
17.05%
14.96%
ILCG
34.88%
2.56%
12.02%
35.08%
17.41%
15.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUSG vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUSG and ILCG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUSG vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUSG vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than ILCG's 0.49% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.58% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.22% |
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.87% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than ILCG's maximum drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and ILCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUSG vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) is 4.81%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that IUSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.