PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IUSG vs. ILCG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and ILCG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

IUSG vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.12%
10.37%
IUSG
ILCG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IUSG:

1.60

ILCG:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

IUSG:

2.12

ILCG:

1.97

Omega Ratio

IUSG:

1.29

ILCG:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

IUSG:

2.27

ILCG:

2.08

Martin Ratio

IUSG:

8.78

ILCG:

8.05

Ulcer Index

IUSG:

3.24%

ILCG:

3.31%

Daily Std Dev

IUSG:

17.88%

ILCG:

18.24%

Max Drawdown

IUSG:

-63.35%

ILCG:

-52.98%

Current Drawdown

IUSG:

-3.20%

ILCG:

-3.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly higher than ILCG's 1.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSG having a 14.55% annualized return and ILCG not far ahead at 15.04%.


IUSG

YTD

1.74%

1M

-2.71%

6M

10.12%

1Y

24.59%

5Y*

15.67%

10Y*

14.55%

ILCG

YTD

1.18%

1M

-3.46%

6M

10.37%

1Y

23.10%

5Y*

15.22%

10Y*

15.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IUSG vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUSG and ILCG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for IUSG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%
Expense ratio chart for ILCG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IUSG vs. ILCG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IUSG is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IUSG is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IUSG is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IUSG is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IUSG is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IUSG is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ILCG is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ILCG is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ILCG is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ILCG is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ILCG is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ILCG is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IUSG vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IUSG, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.601.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for IUSG, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.121.97
The chart of Omega ratio for IUSG, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.291.27
The chart of Calmar ratio for IUSG, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.272.08
The chart of Martin ratio for IUSG, currently valued at 8.78, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.788.05
IUSG
ILCG

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and ILCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.60
1.46
IUSG
ILCG

Dividends

IUSG vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than ILCG's 0.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.58%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%1.21%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.49%0.50%0.69%0.76%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%0.87%

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than ILCG's maximum drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and ILCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.20%
-3.79%
IUSG
ILCG

Volatility

IUSG vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) have volatilities of 5.58% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.58%
5.41%
IUSG
ILCG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab