IUSG vs. DRLL
IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Growth Index, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IUSG returned 26.25%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for DRLL. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
IUSG vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 29.95% return.
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 25.64%
- 3Y*
- 26.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 17.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.27%
DRLL
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- YTD
- 29.95%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $478.10K | $507.89K | $528.94K | |
| $106.69M | $93.84M | $99.41M |
IUSG vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 15.15% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -13.79% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 29.95% | 7.74% | 0.02% | -1.84% | 15.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and DRLL is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.17 |
The correlation between IUSG and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUSG vs. DRLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSG
DRLL
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Technology
IUSG
DRLL
-
Communication Services
IUSG
DRLL
-
Financial Services
IUSG
DRLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
IUSG
DRLL
Industrials
IUSG
DRLL
-
Healthcare
IUSG
DRLL
-
Consumer Defensive
IUSG
DRLL
-
Real Estate
IUSG
DRLL
-
Basic Materials
IUSG
DRLL
-
Utilities
IUSG
DRLL
-
Energy
IUSG
DRLL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSG vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
IUSG
DRLL
IUSG vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.20 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 5.57 | +1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -23.73% | -39.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -16.99% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -23.73% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -9.02% | +8.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.32% | -8.14% | -13.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 6.71% | -3.19% |
Volatility
IUSG vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) is 6.48%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that IUSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 7.42% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 18.67% | -3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 23.14% | -5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 23.82% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 23.82% | -3.26% |
IUSG vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSG vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than DRLL's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.34% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSG and DRLL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRLL has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to IUSG (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs DRLL's -23.73%.
On 3-year performance, IUSG leads with 26.25% vs 11.02% for DRLL. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 26.25% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.48% for IUSG.
IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.41% for DRLL.
DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSG and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer