PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. AFRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. AFRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Invesco Floating Rate ESG Fund (AFRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than AFRAX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed AFRAX with an annualized return of 17.20%, while AFRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.34% annualized return.


IUSG

1D
2.17%
1M
1.92%
6M
11.50%
YTD
12.72%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
17.20%
ALL TIME*
8.19%

AFRAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.06%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
2.11%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
4.34%
ALL TIME*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$105.73M$92.27M$99.82M

IUSG vs. AFRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
12.72%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
AFRAX
Invesco Floating Rate ESG Fund
0.73%4.57%6.80%10.86%-2.26%6.24%1.53%7.25%-0.19%3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and AFRAX is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. AFRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AFRAX
AFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUSG vs. AFRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Invesco Floating Rate ESG Fund (AFRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSGAFRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.51

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

4.35

+2.61

IUSG vs. AFRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the AFRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and AFRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. AFRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than AFRAX's maximum drawdown of -37.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and AFRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGAFRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-37.60%

-25.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-1.41%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-2.62%

-19.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-6.29%

-25.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-18.91%

-13.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-0.16%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.33%

-4.37%

-16.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

0.49%

+3.03%

Volatility

IUSG vs. AFRAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Invesco Floating Rate ESG Fund (AFRAX) at 0.40%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGAFRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

0.40%

+5.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

2.04%

+12.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

2.83%

+15.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.22%

3.23%

+17.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

3.73%

+16.82%

IUSG vs. AFRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than AFRAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSG vs. AFRAX - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than AFRAX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFRAX
Invesco Floating Rate ESG Fund
7.04%8.06%8.39%7.85%7.03%3.84%4.13%5.52%4.59%4.04%4.01%5.23%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.49%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSG and AFRAX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to AFRAX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs AFRAX's -37.60%.

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and AFRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer