PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUSD.DE) and Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc (LCUW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IUSD.DE

1D
-0.49%
1M
7.71%
YTD
20.34%
6M
20.25%
1Y
34.31%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
19.36%
10Y*
11.00%

LCUW.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUSD.DE
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
20.34%6.31%11.81%63.24%2.81%1.82%1.56%1.97%1.58%
LCUW.DE
Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%3.85%25.97%20.04%-14.02%33.02%5.33%31.23%0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSD.DE and LCUW.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.28

The correlation between IUSD.DE and LCUW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSD.DE
IUSD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IUSD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUW.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUSD.DE) and Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc (LCUW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSD.DELCUW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.57

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSD.DELCUW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

Drawdowns

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSD.DELCUW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

Volatility

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSD.DELCUW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUW.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSD.DE vs. LCUW.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUSD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while LCUW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSD.DE
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.81%1.00%1.26%1.47%2.75%1.80%1.55%1.94%1.57%1.45%1.45%1.60%
LCUW.DE
Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSD.DE and LCUW.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUW.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUW.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IUSD.DE.

IUSD.DE tracks MSCI World Islamic Index, while LCUW.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IUSD.DE and 0.12% for LCUW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSD.DE and LCUW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer