PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUSD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSD.DE achieves a 20.34% return, which is significantly higher than DBXW.DE's 10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSD.DE has underperformed DBXW.DE with an annualized return of 11.00%, while DBXW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.75% annualized return.


IUSD.DE

1D
-0.49%
1M
7.71%
YTD
20.34%
6M
20.25%
1Y
34.31%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
19.36%
10Y*
11.00%

DBXW.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.68%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSD.DE
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
20.34%6.31%11.81%63.24%2.81%1.82%1.56%1.97%-2.89%4.32%
DBXW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C
10.90%7.77%25.74%20.10%-13.86%32.72%5.42%31.34%-4.85%7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSD.DE and DBXW.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2008

0.63

Over the past year, IUSD.DE and DBXW.DE have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSD.DE
IUSD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IUSD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXW.DE
DBXW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DBXW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUSD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSD.DEDBXW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.40

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.08

3.58

+3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.57

14.33

+8.24

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the DBXW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSD.DE and DBXW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSD.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.13

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.82

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.49

+0.14

Drawdowns

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSD.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.82%, smaller than the maximum DBXW.DE drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSD.DE and DBXW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSD.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.82%

-53.36%

+29.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

-6.59%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.97%

-21.66%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-21.66%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.97%

-33.81%

+10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.32%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-9.48%

+5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.65%

-0.14%

Volatility

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUSD.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE) at 2.60%. This indicates that IUSD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSD.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

2.60%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

7.73%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

11.09%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

15.02%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

15.54%

+1.39%

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXW.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSD.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUSD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while DBXW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSD.DE
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.81%1.00%1.26%1.47%2.75%1.80%1.55%1.94%1.57%1.45%1.45%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSD.DE and DBXW.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBXW.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXW.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IUSD.DE.

IUSD.DE tracks MSCI World Islamic Index, while DBXW.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IUSD.DE and 0.45% for DBXW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSD.DE and DBXW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer