LCUW.DE vs. TSWE.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc (LCUW.DE) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSWE.DE).
LCUW.DE and TSWE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCUW.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Feb 28, 2018. TSWE.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Solactive Sustainable World Equity. It was launched on May 3, 2013. Both LCUW.DE and TSWE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LCUW.DE or TSWE.DE.
Key characteristics
| LCUW.DE | TSWE.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.11% | 9.29% |
| 1Y Return | 20.47% | 15.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.88% | 3.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.85% | 7.70% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.05 | 1.55 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.82% | 10.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.66% | -33.91% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.87% | -1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUW.DE and TSWE.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LCUW.DE vs. TSWE.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LCUW.DE achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than TSWE.DE's 9.29% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCUW.DE vs. TSWE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCUW.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TSWE.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LCUW.DE vs. TSWE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc (LCUW.DE) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSWE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LCUW.DE vs. TSWE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCUW.DE nor TSWE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LCUW.DE vs. TSWE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, roughly equal to the maximum TSWE.DE drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUW.DE and TSWE.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LCUW.DE vs. TSWE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc (LCUW.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSWE.DE) at 3.66%. This indicates that LCUW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSWE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.