PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCUW.DE vs. AMZN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCUW.DE vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc (LCUW.DE) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCUW.DE is traded in EUR, while AMZN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMZN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


LCUW.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZN

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.94%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.48%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
21.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUW.DE vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCUW.DE
Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%3.85%25.97%20.04%-14.02%33.02%5.33%31.23%0.23%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
11.20%-7.28%53.92%75.46%-46.49%10.03%61.73%25.81%8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUW.DE and AMZN is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCUW.DE vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUW.DE

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUW.DE vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc (LCUW.DE) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LCUW.DE vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCUW.DEAMZNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

Drawdowns

LCUW.DE vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCUW.DEAMZNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.85%

Volatility

LCUW.DE vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCUW.DEAMZNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.73%

Dividends

LCUW.DE vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCUW.DE nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCUW.DE and AMZN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCUW.DE and AMZN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer