IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE
IUS4.DE (iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)) and BATG.DE (L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - IUS4.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Small Cap while BATG.DE tracks the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUS4.DE charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for BATG.DE.
Performance
IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IUS4.DE
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 14.74%
- 6M
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
BATG.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS4.DE iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) | 14.74% | 15.96% | 9.46% | 9.42% | 3.75% |
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 0.00% | 5.88% | 12.80% | 12.76% | 1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUS4.DE and BATG.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IUS4.DE and BATG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IUS4.DE
BATG.DE
IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUS4.DE | BATG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUS4.DE | BATG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUS4.DE | BATG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | — | — |
Volatility
IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUS4.DE | BATG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | — | — |
IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUS4.DE has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BATG.DE's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUS4.DE vs. BATG.DE - Dividend Comparison
IUS4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while BATG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUS4.DE iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.87% | 1.88% | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.10% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.45% | 1.41% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUS4.DE and BATG.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BATG.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BATG.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IUS4.DE.
IUS4.DE tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap, while BATG.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for IUS4.DE and 0.16% for BATG.DE.
Find the right allocation for IUS4.DE and BATG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer