IUS vs. STRN
IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Invesco Strategic US Index, while STRN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by SmartWay. IUS is passively managed, while STRN is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.
Performance
IUS vs. STRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUS having a 18.56% return and STRN slightly higher at 19.31%.
IUS
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
STRN
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUS vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 18.56% | 8.24% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 19.31% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUS and STRN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUS vs. STRN — Risk / Return Rank
IUS
STRN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IUS vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUS | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.84 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUS vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, which is greater than STRN's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and STRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUS | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.67% | -15.43% | -19.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.89% | +8.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -3.00% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | — | — |
Volatility
IUS vs. STRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUS | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 26.85% | -16.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 26.85% | -11.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 26.85% | -8.89% |
IUS vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUS vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison
IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than STRN's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUS and STRN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for STRN.
IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.15% for STRN.
IUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while STRN is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IUS and 0.59% for STRN.
Find the right allocation for IUS and STRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer