PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS achieves a 19.71% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 18.29% return.


IUS

1D
0.43%
1M
3.03%
6M
15.22%
YTD
19.71%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.51%

LVHI

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.74%
6M
13.36%
YTD
18.29%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*
11.87%
ALL TIME*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.30M$3.35M$3.41M
$37.17M$30.23M$26.64M

IUS vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
19.71%16.94%16.51%20.79%-8.34%32.17%15.09%29.34%-12.28%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
18.29%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS and LVHI is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.64

The correlation between IUS and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUS vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUS
LVHI

Technology

21.9%
0.1%

Healthcare

15.2%
7.2%

Communication Services

11.7%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
4.9%

Financial Services

9.5%
25.1%

Industrials

9.1%
13.2%

Energy

8.3%
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
10.5%

Basic Materials

2.8%
6.3%

Utilities

1.2%
10.4%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.2%

Technology

IUS
21.9%
LVHI
0.1%

Healthcare

IUS
15.2%
LVHI
7.2%

Communication Services

IUS
11.7%
LVHI
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IUS
11.3%
LVHI
4.9%

Financial Services

IUS
9.5%
LVHI
25.1%

Industrials

IUS
9.1%
LVHI
13.2%

Energy

IUS
8.3%
LVHI
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

IUS
7.6%
LVHI
10.5%

Basic Materials

IUS
2.8%
LVHI
6.3%

Utilities

IUS
1.2%
LVHI
10.4%

Real Estate

IUS
0.6%
LVHI
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUS
IUS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUS vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.71

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

5.76

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.90

24.05

-1.14

IUS vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUS vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.67%

-32.31%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-6.08%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-11.99%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

-11.99%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.70%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.47%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.45%

-0.01%

Volatility

IUS vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) have volatilities of 2.51% and 2.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

2.48%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

7.58%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

9.46%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

11.05%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

13.70%

+4.22%

IUS vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUS vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than LVHI's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
1.24%1.48%1.52%1.72%1.78%1.46%1.74%1.77%0.73%0.00%0.00%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.51%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUS and LVHI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUS has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to LVHI (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUS dropped -34.67% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 16.77% vs 14.35% for IUS. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 16.77% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 1.24% for IUS.

IUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while LVHI is Dividend. IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IUS and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer