PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 5.33% return.


IUS

1D
0.48%
1M
1.42%
YTD
14.33%
6M
15.01%
1Y
31.17%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*

IDMO

1D
0.67%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
5.33%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
14.33%16.94%16.51%20.79%-8.34%32.17%15.09%29.34%-12.49%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
5.33%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-13.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS and IDMO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.64

The correlation between IUS and IDMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUS vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUS
IDMO

Technology

22.4%
5.3%

Communication Services

14.7%
2.2%

Healthcare

12.8%
1.2%

Energy

10.9%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
1.4%

Industrials

9.7%
22.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
2.5%

Financial Services

6.8%
42.4%

Basic Materials

3.3%
10.2%

Utilities

1.0%
8.4%

Real Estate

0.5%
2.0%

Technology

IUS
22.4%
IDMO
5.3%

Communication Services

IUS
14.7%
IDMO
2.2%

Healthcare

IUS
12.8%
IDMO
1.2%

Energy

IUS
10.9%
IDMO
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IUS
10.7%
IDMO
1.4%

Industrials

IUS
9.7%
IDMO
22.6%

Consumer Defensive

IUS
7.4%
IDMO
2.5%

Financial Services

IUS
6.8%
IDMO
42.4%

Basic Materials

IUS
3.3%
IDMO
10.2%

Utilities

IUS
1.0%
IDMO
8.4%

Real Estate

IUS
0.5%
IDMO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS
IUS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.21

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.09

1.57

+3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.65

6.49

+15.16

IUS vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

1.12

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.85

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.44

+0.40

Drawdowns

IUS vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.67%

-39.38%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-12.31%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-12.65%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

-27.07%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-4.49%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-9.75%

+5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

2.99%

-1.55%

Volatility

IUS vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) is 3.12%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that IUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

6.18%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

15.28%

-7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

17.25%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

17.90%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

18.14%

-0.10%

IUS vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUS vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than IDMO's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.61%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
1.30%1.48%1.52%1.72%1.78%1.46%1.74%1.77%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUS and IDMO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to IUS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUS dropped -34.67% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 15.15% vs 13.42% for IUS. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.30% for IUS.

IUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IUS and 0.25% for IDMO.

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer