IUS vs. ACEP

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. IUS is passively managed, while ACEP is actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.

Performance

IUS vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS achieves a 21.90% return, which is significantly lower than ACEP's 24.65% return.

IUS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 4.05%
• 6M: 16.20%
• YTD: 21.90%
• 1Y: 35.91%
• 3Y*: 20.76%
• 5Y*: 14.69%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.75%

ACEP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.51%
• 6M: 15.44%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF	$36.53K	$36.84K	$48.24K
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	$5.76M	$3.95M	$3.56M

IUS vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	21.90%	5.16%
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF	24.65%	8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS and ACEP is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.69

IUS vs. ACEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUS	ACEP
Technology	21.7%	34.3%
Healthcare	15.4%	8.2%
Communication Services	11.2%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	2.8%
Financial Services	9.6%	14.4%
Industrials	9.0%	12.1%
Energy	8.5%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	1.9%
Basic Materials	3.1%	11.1%
Utilities	1.4%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	1.6%

Return for Risk

IUS vs. ACEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 96
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ACEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUS vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IUS	ACEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.98	—	—

Drawdowns

IUS vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and ACEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUS	ACEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.67%	-7.06%	-27.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.44%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-1.74%	-2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IUS	ACEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.60%	16.86%	-6.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.00%	16.86%	-1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	16.86%	+1.06%

IUS vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUS vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison

IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF	0.11%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.22%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUS and ACEP in my portfolio?

IUS and ACEP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IUS or ACEP?

On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUS or ACEP?

IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IUS or ACEP?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.

What is the main difference between IUS and ACEP?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IUS and 0.45% for ACEP.