IUQA.L vs. LQD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD).

IUQA.L and LQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUQA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. It was launched on Feb 21, 2018. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both IUQA.L and LQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IUQA.L vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IUQA.L vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	-3.10%	12.50%	22.46%	30.92%	-20.74%	27.56%	16.09%	33.32%	-6.99%	22.18%
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	-0.27%	7.90%	0.86%	9.40%	-17.92%	-1.84%	10.97%	17.37%	-3.79%	7.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUQA.L achieves a -3.10% return, which is significantly lower than LQD's -0.27% return.

IUQA.L

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -4.74%
• YTD: -3.10%
• 6M: -0.31%
• 1Y: 13.90%
• 3Y*: 17.26%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: —

LQD

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 4.30%
• 5Y*: 0.11%
• 10Y*: 2.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQA.L vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUQA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IUQA.L

iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating

LQD

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

IUQA.L vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUQA.L

IUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
IUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

LQD

LQD Risk / Return Rank: 39
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQA.L vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUQA.L	LQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	0.70	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	0.99	+0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.13	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	1.48	+0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	4.06	+2.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUQA.L vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQA.L and LQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUQA.L	LQD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	0.70	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.01	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.54	+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between IUQA.L and LQD is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IUQA.L vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

IUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.56%	4.48%	4.45%	3.99%	3.30%	2.30%	2.66%	3.29%	3.67%	3.10%	3.34%	3.47%

Drawdowns

IUQA.L vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQA.L and LQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUQA.L	LQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.96%	-24.95%	-9.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.32%	-3.38%	-7.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.77%	-24.95%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.46%	-4.42%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-3.99%	-0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.23%	+0.77%

Volatility

IUQA.L vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 2.66%. This indicates that IUQA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUQA.L	LQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	2.66%	+2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.24%	3.76%	+4.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	6.60%	+8.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	8.65%	+7.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.77%	8.67%	+8.10%