IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L
IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUIS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUIS.L returned 12.20%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for EIMI.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUIS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUIS.L achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 24.25% return.
IUIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- —
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 24.25%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 49.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.57% | 19.24% | 17.42% | 17.93% | -5.28% | 20.71% | 9.96% | 28.50% | -14.17% | 16.92% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 24.25% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -14.17% | 21.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUIS.L and EIMI.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.54 |
The correlation between IUIS.L and EIMI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUIS.L
EIMI.L
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IUIS.L
EIMI.L
Utilities
IUIS.L
EIMI.L
Technology
IUIS.L
EIMI.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUIS.L
EIMI.L
Basic Materials
IUIS.L
EIMI.L
Communication Services
IUIS.L
-
EIMI.L
Consumer Defensive
IUIS.L
-
EIMI.L
Energy
IUIS.L
-
EIMI.L
Financial Services
IUIS.L
-
EIMI.L
Healthcare
IUIS.L
-
EIMI.L
Real Estate
IUIS.L
-
EIMI.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUIS.L
EIMI.L
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUIS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.47 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.88 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 14.02 | -5.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUIS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.56 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.42 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.36 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIS.L and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUIS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.18% | -38.73% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -12.66% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | -17.44% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.22% | -35.50% | +14.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -2.64% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -14.04% | +8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.52% | -0.82% |
Volatility
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) is 4.96%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that IUIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUIS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 8.18% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 16.71% | -4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 19.23% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 18.31% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 19.15% | +0.47% |
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUIS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUIS.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUIS.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUIS.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.
IUIS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIS.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for IUIS.L and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer