IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L).
IUFS.L and EIMI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUFS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both IUFS.L and EIMI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | -9.56% | 15.05% | 30.22% | 12.12% | -11.04% | 36.28% | -3.33% | 31.22% | -14.36% | 23.02% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 4.48% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -14.17% | 36.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUFS.L achieves a -9.56% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 4.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IUFS.L has outperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 12.20%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.
IUFS.L
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -9.56%
- 6M
- -6.71%
- 1Y
- 1.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
EIMI.L
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 33.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUFS.L
EIMI.L
IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUFS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | 1.79 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.21 | 2.35 | -2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.34 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 2.68 | -2.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | 9.80 | -9.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUFS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 1.79 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.27 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.45 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.28 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between IUFS.L and EIMI.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUFS.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUFS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUFS.L and EIMI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUFS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -38.73% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -12.66% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | -35.66% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.92% | -38.73% | -4.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.29% | -9.03% | -2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -14.21% | +6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 3.47% | +1.15% |
Volatility
IUFS.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) is 5.40%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that IUFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IUFS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 8.48% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 13.79% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 18.87% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 17.75% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 18.90% | +2.17% |