ITOT vs. QQQM
ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITOT returned 12.20%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITOT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
ITOT vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 17.59% return.
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 17.59%
- 6M
- 17.91%
- 1Y
- 37.64%
- 3Y*
- 26.52%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 9.69% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 8.51% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 17.59% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOT and QQQM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ITOT and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
ITOT vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITOT
QQQM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
ITOT
QQQM
Financial Services
ITOT
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
ITOT
QQQM
Communication Services
ITOT
QQQM
Industrials
ITOT
QQQM
Healthcare
ITOT
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
ITOT
QQQM
Energy
ITOT
QQQM
Real Estate
ITOT
QQQM
Utilities
ITOT
QQQM
Basic Materials
ITOT
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITOT vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
ITOT
QQQM
ITOT vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITOT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.02 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 11.23 | +1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITOT vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.20% | -35.04% | -20.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -11.96% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -22.70% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -35.04% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -3.33% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -8.23% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 3.21% | -1.22% |
Volatility
ITOT vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) is 4.57%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that ITOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITOT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 7.45% | -2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 13.71% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 17.11% | -4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 22.40% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 22.22% | -3.93% |
ITOT vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITOT vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than QQQM's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.99% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ITOT and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQM has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to ITOT (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.94% vs 12.20% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.94% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.43% for QQQM.
ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITOT and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer