PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITOT vs. PSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITOT vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.


ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%

PSCX

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.00%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.98%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITOT vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%1.02%
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
5.11%12.08%13.27%16.57%-7.35%9.03%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and PSCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.90

The correlation between ITOT and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITOT vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITOT
PSCX

Technology

33.8%
33.2%

Financial Services

12.1%
12.5%

Communication Services

10.3%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.0%

Industrials

9.5%
8.4%

Healthcare

9.0%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.4%

Energy

3.7%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.0%

Utilities

2.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.9%

Technology

ITOT
33.8%
PSCX
33.2%

Financial Services

ITOT
12.1%
PSCX
12.5%

Communication Services

ITOT
10.3%
PSCX
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ITOT
10.1%
PSCX
10.0%

Industrials

ITOT
9.5%
PSCX
8.4%

Healthcare

ITOT
9.0%
PSCX
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

ITOT
4.7%
PSCX
5.4%

Energy

ITOT
3.7%
PSCX
4.2%

Real Estate

ITOT
2.4%
PSCX
2.0%

Utilities

ITOT
2.3%
PSCX
2.6%

Basic Materials

ITOT
2.1%
PSCX
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITOT vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITOT vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITOTPSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.58

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.70

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.57

18.94

-4.37

ITOT vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITOTPSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.82

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

1.20

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.27

-0.70

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and PSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITOTPSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-10.20%

-45.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-4.20%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-9.61%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-10.20%

-15.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.12%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-1.87%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.82%

+1.12%

Volatility

ITOT vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.89%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITOTPSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

0.89%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

4.21%

+4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

5.53%

+6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

7.07%

+10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

6.96%

+11.30%

ITOT vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITOT vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ITOT and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.69% vs 8.46% for PSCX. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.75% for PSCX.

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and PSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer