ITOT vs. PSCX
ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ITOT is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITOT returned 12.69%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITOT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
ITOT vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 1.02% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.11% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOT and PSCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ITOT and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
ITOT vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITOT
PSCX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
ITOT
PSCX
Financial Services
ITOT
PSCX
Communication Services
ITOT
PSCX
Consumer Cyclical
ITOT
PSCX
Industrials
ITOT
PSCX
Healthcare
ITOT
PSCX
Consumer Defensive
ITOT
PSCX
Energy
ITOT
PSCX
Real Estate
ITOT
PSCX
Utilities
ITOT
PSCX
Basic Materials
ITOT
PSCX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITOT vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
ITOT
PSCX
ITOT vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITOT | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.58 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.70 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.57 | 18.94 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITOT | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.82 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.20 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.27 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
ITOT vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOT | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.20% | -10.20% | -45.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -4.20% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -9.61% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -10.20% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.12% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -1.87% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.82% | +1.12% |
Volatility
ITOT vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.89%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITOT | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 0.89% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 4.21% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 5.53% | +6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 7.07% | +10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 6.96% | +11.30% |
ITOT vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITOT vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ITOT and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs PSCX's -10.20%.
On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.69% vs 8.46% for PSCX. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.75% for PSCX.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITOT and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer