PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITOT vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITOT vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 35.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ITOT has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 15.35%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.


ITOT

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
8.95%
6M
7.49%
1Y
22.95%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
15.35%

MTUM

1D
3.32%
1M
8.16%
YTD
35.82%
6M
33.08%
1Y
45.28%
3Y*
35.42%
5Y*
15.79%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITOT vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
8.95%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
35.82%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and MTUM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.86

The correlation between ITOT and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITOT vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITOT
MTUM

Technology

37.2%
50.2%

Financial Services

11.4%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
2.9%

Communication Services

9.8%
5.1%

Industrials

9.1%
15.0%

Healthcare

8.8%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.7%

Energy

3.3%
10.5%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.3%

Utilities

2.1%
0.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.3%

Technology

ITOT
37.2%
MTUM
50.2%

Financial Services

ITOT
11.4%
MTUM
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ITOT
9.8%
MTUM
2.9%

Communication Services

ITOT
9.8%
MTUM
5.1%

Industrials

ITOT
9.1%
MTUM
15.0%

Healthcare

ITOT
8.8%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

ITOT
4.3%
MTUM
3.7%

Energy

ITOT
3.3%
MTUM
10.5%

Real Estate

ITOT
2.3%
MTUM
1.3%

Utilities

ITOT
2.1%
MTUM
0.6%

Basic Materials

ITOT
2.0%
MTUM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITOT vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITOT vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITOTMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.94

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.40

14.99

-3.60

ITOT vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITOTMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-34.08%

-21.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-11.54%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-20.99%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-32.28%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-34.08%

-0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-1.71%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-6.19%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.03%

-1.01%

Volatility

ITOT vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) is 4.87%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that ITOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITOTMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

12.20%

-7.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

19.59%

-9.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

22.09%

-9.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

21.20%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

21.33%

-3.06%

ITOT vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITOT vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than MTUM's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.55%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITOT and MTUM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to ITOT (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.88% vs 15.35% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 15.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.55% for MTUM.

ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer