PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITOT vs. IUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITOT vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.


ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%

IUS

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.89%
YTD
15.71%
6M
15.69%
1Y
33.27%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITOT vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-13.69%
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
15.71%16.94%16.51%20.79%-8.34%32.17%15.09%29.34%-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and IUS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.87

The correlation between ITOT and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITOT vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITOT
IUS

Technology

33.8%
22.4%

Financial Services

12.1%
6.8%

Communication Services

10.3%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.7%

Industrials

9.5%
9.7%

Healthcare

9.0%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
7.4%

Energy

3.7%
10.9%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.5%

Utilities

2.3%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.1%
3.3%

Technology

ITOT
33.8%
IUS
22.4%

Financial Services

ITOT
12.1%
IUS
6.8%

Communication Services

ITOT
10.3%
IUS
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ITOT
10.1%
IUS
10.7%

Industrials

ITOT
9.5%
IUS
9.7%

Healthcare

ITOT
9.0%
IUS
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

ITOT
4.7%
IUS
7.4%

Energy

ITOT
3.7%
IUS
10.9%

Real Estate

ITOT
2.4%
IUS
0.5%

Utilities

ITOT
2.3%
IUS
1.0%

Basic Materials

ITOT
2.1%
IUS
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITOT vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IUS
IUS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITOT vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITOTIUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.60

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

5.44

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.57

23.27

-8.70

ITOT vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITOTIUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

3.26

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.91

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.85

-0.28

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than IUS's maximum drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and IUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITOTIUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-34.67%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.15%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-15.61%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-18.72%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.07%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-3.86%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.43%

+0.51%

Volatility

ITOT vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.50%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITOTIUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.50%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

7.41%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

10.26%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

15.00%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

18.04%

+0.22%

ITOT vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITOT vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than IUS's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
1.28%1.48%1.52%1.72%1.78%1.46%1.74%1.77%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITOT and IUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to IUS (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs IUS's -34.67%.

On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.61% vs 12.69% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.98% for ITOT.

ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.19% for IUS.

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and IUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer