ITEQ vs. SILJ
ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITEQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ returned 11.00%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
ITEQ vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 11.00%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.
ITEQ
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
ITEQ vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 17.19% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEQ and SILJ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2015 | 0.27 |
ITEQ vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITEQ
SILJ
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
ITEQ
SILJ
-
Industrials
ITEQ
SILJ
-
Utilities
ITEQ
SILJ
-
Financial Services
ITEQ
SILJ
Consumer Cyclical
ITEQ
SILJ
-
Healthcare
ITEQ
SILJ
-
Energy
ITEQ
SILJ
-
Communication Services
ITEQ
SILJ
Basic Materials
ITEQ
-
SILJ
Consumer Defensive
ITEQ
-
SILJ
Real Estate
ITEQ
-
SILJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEQ vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
ITEQ
SILJ
ITEQ vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEQ | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.24 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 7.99 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEQ | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.05 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.30 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.22 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.09 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
ITEQ vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEQ | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -79.04% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -34.71% | +21.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | -34.71% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | -55.47% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | -70.06% | +15.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.17% | -26.80% | +13.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -41.43% | +22.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 14.06% | -9.20% |
Volatility
ITEQ vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) is 7.71%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that ITEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEQ | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 18.69% | -10.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 45.24% | -27.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 54.90% | -32.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 44.35% | -19.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 46.24% | -22.84% |
ITEQ vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITEQ vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than SILJ's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.72% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEQ and SILJ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to ITEQ (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 10-year performance, ITEQ leads with 11.00% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITEQ has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.72% for ITEQ.
ITEQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while SILJ is Silver. ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITEQ and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer