ITEQ vs. MJ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and MJ (Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITEQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while MJ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Prime Alternative Harvest Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITEQ returned -1.44%/yr vs -33.92%/yr for MJ. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ITEQ vs. MJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than MJ's -20.97% return.

ITEQ

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: -3.28%
• 6M: 5.33%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 1Y: 21.03%
• 3Y*: 12.50%
• 5Y*: -1.44%
• 10Y*: 9.84%
• ALL TIME*: 9.19%

MJ

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -8.25%
• 6M: -10.34%
• YTD: -20.97%
• 1Y: 12.98%
• 3Y*: -11.63%
• 5Y*: -33.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -27.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF	$214.03K	$196.04K	$284.63K
MJ Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF	$502.35K	$669.94K	$959.28K

ITEQ vs. MJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF	10.36%	13.71%	11.70%	4.70%	-30.36%	-8.04%	58.96%	37.59%	0.02%
MJ Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF	-20.97%	13.07%	-23.97%	-24.18%	-61.55%	-22.79%	-16.18%	-31.36%	-25.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEQ and MJ is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2018	0.50

The correlation between ITEQ and MJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITEQ vs. MJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ITEQ	MJ
Technology	64.1%	0.6%
Industrials	11.2%	-
Utilities	9.1%	-
Financial Services	5.1%	0.3%
Healthcare	4.4%	76.4%
Consumer Cyclical	3.3%	0.9%
Communication Services	2.9%	-
Energy	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	18.3%
Real Estate	-	3.3%

Return for Risk

ITEQ vs. MJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITEQ

ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 38

MJ

MJ Risk / Return Rank: 19
MJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MJ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
MJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
MJ Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITEQ vs. MJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITEQ	MJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.15	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.01	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.11	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	0.27	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.96	0.41	+3.55

ITEQ vs. MJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the MJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEQ and MJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ITEQ vs. MJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum MJ drawdown of -96.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and MJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITEQ	MJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.63%	-96.55%	+41.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.29%	-48.66%	+35.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.90%	-69.73%	+46.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.29%	-91.79%	+41.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.23%	-94.90%	+76.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.49%	-69.68%	+51.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	31.55%	-26.23%

Volatility

ITEQ vs. MJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) is 8.08%, while Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that ITEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITEQ	MJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.08%	10.68%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.94%	39.33%	-19.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.63%	86.18%	-61.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.36%	59.99%	-34.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.57%	55.44%	-31.87%

ITEQ vs. MJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ITEQ and MJ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ITEQ vs. MJ - Dividend Comparison

ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than MJ's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF	0.77%	0.85%	0.01%
MJ Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF	2.51%	1.98%	13.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITEQ and MJ in my portfolio?

ITEQ and MJ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITEQ or MJ?

MJ has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to ITEQ (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs MJ's -96.55%.

Which ETF is better, ITEQ or MJ?

On 5-year performance, ITEQ leads with -1.44% vs -33.92% for MJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITEQ or MJ?

Over the 5-year period, ITEQ has performed better with a -1.44% return vs -33.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITEQ or MJ?

ITEQ and MJ have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITEQ or MJ?

MJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.77% for ITEQ.

What is the main difference between ITEQ and MJ?

ITEQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while MJ is Small Cap Blend Equities. ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while MJ tracks Prime Alternative Harvest Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Amplify.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.