ITEQ vs. IPAY
ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from ETFMG - ITEQ tracks the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index while IPAY tracks the Prime Mobile Payments Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ returned 9.84%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for IPAY. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than IPAY's -2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ has outperformed IPAY with an annualized return of 9.84%, while IPAY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.
ITEQ
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 21.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- -1.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.19%
IPAY
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 1Y
- -9.51%
- 3Y*
- 6.01%
- 5Y*
- -5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.69M | $3.96M | $2.49M | |
| $214.03K | $196.04K | $284.63K |
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 10.36% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -2.46% | -9.55% | 25.88% | 18.21% | -32.38% | -12.72% | 34.22% | 41.80% | 0.17% | 36.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEQ and IPAY is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2015 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ITEQ and IPAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITEQ
IPAY
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
ITEQ
IPAY
Industrials
ITEQ
IPAY
Utilities
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Financial Services
ITEQ
IPAY
Healthcare
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Communication Services
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Energy
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Basic Materials
ITEQ
-
IPAY
-
Consumer Defensive
ITEQ
-
IPAY
-
Real Estate
ITEQ
-
IPAY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEQ vs. IPAY — Risk / Return Rank
ITEQ
IPAY
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITEQ | IPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.95 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | -0.31 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | -0.52 | +4.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than IPAY's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and IPAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEQ | IPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -51.75% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -30.88% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.90% | -32.74% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | -51.49% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | -51.75% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.23% | -29.38% | +11.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -16.93% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 18.21% | -12.89% |
Volatility
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Volatility Comparison
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) at 7.11%. This indicates that ITEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEQ | IPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 7.11% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 19.94% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 24.73% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 26.33% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 25.43% | -1.86% |
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ITEQ and IPAY have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Dividend Comparison
ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than IPAY's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.77% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.77% | 0.85% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEQ and IPAY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITEQ has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to IPAY (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs IPAY's -51.75%.
On 10-year performance, ITEQ leads with 9.84% vs 7.66% for IPAY. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITEQ has performed better with a 9.84% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITEQ and IPAY have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.77% for ITEQ.
ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index.
ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITEQ and IPAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer