PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITEQ vs. IPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly higher than IPAY's -16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ has outperformed IPAY with an annualized return of 11.00%, while IPAY has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.


ITEQ

1D
-2.89%
1M
7.48%
YTD
17.19%
6M
20.44%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
11.00%

IPAY

1D
-4.17%
1M
-9.09%
YTD
-16.45%
6M
-16.03%
1Y
-23.21%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
-8.70%
10Y*
5.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
17.19%13.71%11.70%4.70%-30.36%-8.04%58.96%37.59%-0.63%26.87%
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
-16.45%-9.55%25.88%18.21%-32.38%-12.72%34.22%41.80%0.17%36.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEQ and IPAY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2015

0.74

The correlation between ITEQ and IPAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITEQ
IPAY

Technology

58.7%
54.6%

Industrials

16.6%
4.1%

Utilities

10.1%

-

Financial Services

5.1%
41.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%

-

Healthcare

2.3%

-

Energy

2.0%

-

Communication Services

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

ITEQ
58.7%
IPAY
54.6%

Industrials

ITEQ
16.6%
IPAY
4.1%

Utilities

ITEQ
10.1%
IPAY

-

Financial Services

ITEQ
5.1%
IPAY
41.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ITEQ
3.3%
IPAY

-

Healthcare

ITEQ
2.3%
IPAY

-

Energy

ITEQ
2.0%
IPAY

-

Communication Services

ITEQ
1.4%
IPAY

-

Basic Materials

ITEQ

-

IPAY

-

Consumer Defensive

ITEQ

-

IPAY

-

Real Estate

ITEQ

-

IPAY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITEQ vs. IPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITEQ
ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IPAY
IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITEQIPAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.84

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

-0.74

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.76

-1.42

+7.19

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the IPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEQ and IPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITEQIPAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

-0.98

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

-0.34

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.24

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.21

+0.22

Drawdowns

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than IPAY's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and IPAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITEQIPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-51.75%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-31.31%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.78%

-32.74%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.29%

-51.49%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.63%

-51.75%

-2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.17%

-39.51%

+26.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-16.67%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

16.32%

-11.46%

Volatility

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Volatility Comparison

BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) at 6.51%. This indicates that ITEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITEQIPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

6.51%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.33%

18.19%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.77%

23.70%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.96%

26.04%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

25.38%

-1.98%

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ITEQ and IPAY have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

ITEQ vs. IPAY - Dividend Comparison

ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than IPAY's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
0.94%0.79%0.77%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
0.72%0.85%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITEQ and IPAY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITEQ has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to IPAY (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs IPAY's -51.75%.

On 10-year performance, ITEQ leads with 11.00% vs 5.98% for IPAY. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITEQ has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITEQ and IPAY have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.72% for ITEQ.

ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index.

ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITEQ and IPAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer