ITEQ vs. IPAY
ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from ETFMG - ITEQ tracks the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index while IPAY tracks the Prime Mobile Payments Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ returned 11.00%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for IPAY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly higher than IPAY's -16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ has outperformed IPAY with an annualized return of 11.00%, while IPAY has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.
ITEQ
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
IPAY
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -16.03%
- 1Y
- -23.21%
- 3Y*
- 1.92%
- 5Y*
- -8.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 17.19% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -16.45% | -9.55% | 25.88% | 18.21% | -32.38% | -12.72% | 34.22% | 41.80% | 0.17% | 36.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEQ and IPAY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ITEQ and IPAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITEQ
IPAY
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
ITEQ
IPAY
Industrials
ITEQ
IPAY
Utilities
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Financial Services
ITEQ
IPAY
Consumer Cyclical
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Healthcare
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Energy
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Communication Services
ITEQ
IPAY
-
Basic Materials
ITEQ
-
IPAY
-
Consumer Defensive
ITEQ
-
IPAY
-
Real Estate
ITEQ
-
IPAY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEQ vs. IPAY — Risk / Return Rank
ITEQ
IPAY
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEQ | IPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.84 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | -0.74 | +2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | -1.42 | +7.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEQ | IPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | -0.98 | +2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | -0.34 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.24 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.21 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than IPAY's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and IPAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEQ | IPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -51.75% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -31.31% | +18.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | -32.74% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | -51.49% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | -51.75% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.17% | -39.51% | +26.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -16.67% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 16.32% | -11.46% |
Volatility
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Volatility Comparison
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) at 6.51%. This indicates that ITEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEQ | IPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 6.51% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 18.19% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 23.70% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 26.04% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 25.38% | -1.98% |
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ITEQ and IPAY have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
ITEQ vs. IPAY - Dividend Comparison
ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than IPAY's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.94% | 0.79% | 0.77% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.72% | 0.85% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEQ and IPAY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITEQ has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to IPAY (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs IPAY's -51.75%.
On 10-year performance, ITEQ leads with 11.00% vs 5.98% for IPAY. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITEQ has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITEQ and IPAY have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.72% for ITEQ.
ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index.
ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITEQ and IPAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer