ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L
ITEK.L (HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF) and RMAP.L (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - ITEK.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Innovative Technologies Index, while RMAP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITEK.L returned 6.54%/yr vs 18.68%/yr for RMAP.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITEK.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RMAP.L.
Performance
ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ITEK.L is traded in USD, while RMAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RMAP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEK.L achieves a 24.28% return, which is significantly higher than RMAP.L's 3.60% return.
ITEK.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 13.86%
- YTD
- 24.28%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 44.45%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- —
RMAP.L
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 32.29%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.68%
- 10Y*
- —
ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEK.L HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 24.28% | 18.69% | 12.39% | 51.33% | -45.52% | 7.82% | 48.47% |
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 3.60% | 65.08% | 25.86% | 12.74% | -0.20% | -3.69% | 16.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEK.L and RMAP.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020 | 0.12 |
The correlation between ITEK.L and RMAP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITEK.L
RMAP.L
ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ITEK.L) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEK.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.17 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 2.39 | +2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEK.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 0.67 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.74 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.71 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEK.L drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, which is greater than RMAP.L's maximum drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEK.L and RMAP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEK.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.15% | -27.53% | -26.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -27.53% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | -27.53% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.31% | -27.53% | -25.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -18.30% | +16.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -7.93% | -11.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.77% | 13.46% | -4.69% |
Volatility
ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L - Volatility Comparison
HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ITEK.L) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) at 5.72%. This indicates that ITEK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEK.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 5.72% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.45% | 20.92% | -2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.14% | 47.97% | -23.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 25.63% | +1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 24.68% | +2.04% |
ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEK.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAP.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITEK.L vs. RMAP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ITEK.L nor RMAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEK.L and RMAP.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMAP.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMAP.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ITEK.L.
ITEK.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while RMAP.L is Precious Metals. ITEK.L tracks Solactive Innovative Technologies Index, while RMAP.L tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ITEK.L and 0.22% for RMAP.L.
Find the right allocation for ITEK.L and RMAP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer