ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ITEK.L) and HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (CLMP.L).
ITEK.L and CLMP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITEK.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Solactive Innovative Technologies Index. It was launched on May 10, 2018. CLMP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Dec 3, 2020. Both ITEK.L and CLMP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEK.L HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF | -7.01% | 18.69% | 12.39% | 51.33% | -45.52% | 7.82% | 5.11% |
CLMP.L HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF | -0.01% | 26.65% | -16.53% | 3.87% | -27.91% | 5.71% | 9.23% |
Different Trading Currencies
ITEK.L is traded in USD, while CLMP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CLMP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEK.L achieves a -7.01% return, which is significantly lower than CLMP.L's -0.01% return.
ITEK.L
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -7.01%
- 6M
- -13.12%
- 1Y
- 23.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
CLMP.L
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 32.46%
- 3Y*
- 0.63%
- 5Y*
- -4.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEK.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CLMP.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITEK.L
CLMP.L
ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ITEK.L) and HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (CLMP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEK.L | CLMP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.68 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.29 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.67 | 1.90 | +0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEK.L | CLMP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.68 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | -0.12 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.05 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEK.L and CLMP.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ITEK.L nor CLMP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEK.L drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, which is greater than CLMP.L's maximum drawdown of -51.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEK.L and CLMP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEK.L | CLMP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.15% | -48.75% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -29.66% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.31% | -48.75% | -4.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.01% | -26.76% | +8.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.76% | -23.89% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 16.78% | -8.51% |
Volatility
ITEK.L vs. CLMP.L - Volatility Comparison
HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ITEK.L) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (CLMP.L) at 6.93%. This indicates that ITEK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLMP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ITEK.L | CLMP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 6.93% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.71% | 43.60% | -24.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.47% | 47.41% | -21.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 36.31% | -9.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 35.88% | -9.21% |