PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDH vs. SWYNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ITDH vs. SWYNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund (SWYNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ITDH vs. SWYNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDH
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF
-1.36%21.75%16.71%12.83%
SWYNX
Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund
-3.91%20.19%14.71%16.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDH achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly higher than SWYNX's -3.91% return.


ITDH

1D
3.10%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
1.62%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SWYNX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
-3.91%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ITDH vs. SWYNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDH has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYNX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ITDH vs. SWYNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDH
ITDH Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ITDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDH Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYNX
SWYNX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SWYNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDH vs. SWYNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund (SWYNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDHSWYNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.04

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.54

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.30

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.37

6.20

+2.17

ITDH vs. SWYNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDH Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the SWYNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDH and SWYNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDHSWYNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.04

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.63

+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between ITDH and SWYNX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ITDH vs. SWYNX - Dividend Comparison

ITDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than SWYNX's 2.00% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITDH
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF
1.63%1.60%1.66%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWYNX
Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund
2.00%1.92%1.97%4.00%1.96%1.77%1.66%1.99%0.00%1.45%

Drawdowns

ITDH vs. SWYNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDH drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum SWYNX drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDH and SWYNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDHSWYNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-31.91%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-11.43%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-9.01%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-4.96%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.39%

+0.17%

Volatility

ITDH vs. SWYNX - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund (SWYNX) at 4.97%. This indicates that ITDH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWYNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ITDHSWYNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

4.97%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

8.88%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

16.01%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

15.29%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

16.63%

-2.10%