ITDH vs. SWYNX
ITDH (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF) and SWYNX (Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, ITDH returned 29.02% vs 28.50% for SWYNX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ITDH charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWYNX.
Performance
ITDH vs. SWYNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ITDH having a 12.29% return and SWYNX slightly higher at 12.86%.
ITDH
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWYNX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 12.86%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- —
ITDH vs. SWYNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 12.29% | 21.75% | 16.71% | 12.83% |
SWYNX Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund | 12.86% | 20.19% | 14.71% | 16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITDH and SWYNX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ITDH and SWYNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITDH vs. SWYNX — Risk / Return Rank
ITDH
SWYNX
ITDH vs. SWYNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund (SWYNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITDH | SWYNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.21 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | 14.35 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITDH | SWYNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.44 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.75 | 0.74 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
ITDH vs. SWYNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITDH drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum SWYNX drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDH and SWYNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITDH | SWYNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -31.91% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -9.01% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | 0.00% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -4.88% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 2.01% | +0.17% |
Volatility
ITDH vs. SWYNX - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund (SWYNX) at 3.57%. This indicates that ITDH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWYNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITDH | SWYNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 3.57% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 9.47% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 11.90% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 15.40% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 16.60% | -2.08% |
ITDH vs. SWYNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITDH has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYNX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITDH vs. SWYNX - Dividend Comparison
ITDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than SWYNX's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 1.43% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWYNX Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund | 1.70% | 1.92% | 1.97% | 4.00% | 1.96% | 1.77% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, ITDH and SWYNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITDH has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to SWYNX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDH dropped -16.25% vs SWYNX's -31.91%.
SWYNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITDH and SWYNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer