PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDG vs. DGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDG vs. DGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDG achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 12.72% return.


ITDG

1D
-0.79%
1M
4.78%
YTD
12.04%
6M
12.96%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGT

1D
-0.58%
1M
5.01%
YTD
12.72%
6M
14.40%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
14.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDG vs. DGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDG
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF
12.04%21.85%16.56%12.83%
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
12.72%30.04%14.15%11.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDG and DGT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

0.92

The correlation between ITDG and DGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITDG vs. DGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITDG
DGT

Technology

27.1%
17.7%

Financial Services

16.1%
17.1%

Industrials

11.8%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.5%

Healthcare

8.2%
10.9%

Communication Services

8.0%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
7.6%

Energy

4.3%
7.1%

Basic Materials

4.3%
7.1%

Real Estate

3.8%
1.4%

Utilities

2.6%
3.8%

Technology

ITDG
27.1%
DGT
17.7%

Financial Services

ITDG
16.1%
DGT
17.1%

Industrials

ITDG
11.8%
DGT
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ITDG
9.3%
DGT
7.5%

Healthcare

ITDG
8.2%
DGT
10.9%

Communication Services

ITDG
8.0%
DGT
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

ITDG
4.8%
DGT
7.6%

Energy

ITDG
4.3%
DGT
7.1%

Basic Materials

ITDG
4.3%
DGT
7.1%

Real Estate

ITDG
3.8%
DGT
1.4%

Utilities

ITDG
2.6%
DGT
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDG vs. DGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDG
ITDG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDG vs. DGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDGDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.70

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

15.02

-1.68

ITDG vs. DGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the DGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDG and DGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDGDGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.59

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.75

0.29

+1.45

Drawdowns

ITDG vs. DGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDG drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDG and DGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDGDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-55.36%

+38.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-8.38%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.58%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-13.83%

+12.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.06%

+0.10%

Volatility

ITDG vs. DGT - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF (ITDG) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDGDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.94%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

9.54%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

11.98%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

15.16%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.44%

16.95%

-2.51%

ITDG vs. DGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDG has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DGT's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITDG vs. DGT - Dividend Comparison

ITDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than DGT's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.52%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%
ITDG
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2055 ETF
1.43%1.60%1.44%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ITDG and DGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DGT has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to ITDG (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDG dropped -16.60% vs DGT's -55.36%.

On 1-year performance, DGT leads with 30.90% vs 28.74% for ITDG. On fees, ITDG is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, ITDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGT has performed better with a 30.90% return vs 28.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITDG is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.43% for ITDG.

ITDG is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while DGT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDG and 0.50% for DGT.

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDG and DGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer