ITDF vs. DGT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ITDF (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF) and DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDF is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while DGT is a Global Equities fund tracking the The Global Dow. ITDF is actively managed, while DGT is passively managed. Over the past year, ITDF returned 21.78% vs 25.40% for DGT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITDF charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DGT.

Performance

ITDF vs. DGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDF achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 11.87% return.

ITDF

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 7.69%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 21.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DGT

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 9.23%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 20.47%
• 5Y*: 14.03%
• 10Y*: 13.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDF vs. DGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ITDF Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF	10.71%	20.86%	16.15%	12.92%
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF	11.87%	30.04%	14.15%	11.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDF and DGT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	0.93

The correlation between ITDF and DGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ITDF vs. DGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDF

ITDF Risk / Return Rank: 66
ITDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ITDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ITDF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ITDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ITDF Martin Ratio Rank: 70

DGT

DGT Risk / Return Rank: 79
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDF vs. DGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITDF	DGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.05	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.87	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.38	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	3.04	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.08	12.03	-1.95

ITDF vs. DGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDF Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the DGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDF and DGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ITDF vs. DGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDF drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDF and DGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITDF	DGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.67%	-55.36%	+39.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-8.38%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-1.56%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-13.78%	+12.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	2.12%	+0.04%

Volatility

ITDF vs. DGT - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) at 3.73%. This indicates that ITDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITDF	DGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	3.73%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	10.36%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	12.47%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.95%	15.20%	-1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.95%	16.78%	-2.83%

ITDF vs. DGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDF has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DGT's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITDF vs. DGT - Dividend Comparison

ITDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than DGT's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF	2.51%	2.78%	2.83%	2.53%	3.15%	2.66%	1.97%	2.76%	2.50%	1.93%	2.31%	2.37%
ITDF Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF	1.49%	1.65%	1.55%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITDF and DGT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ITDF and DGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ITDF or DGT?

ITDF has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to DGT (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDF dropped -15.67% vs DGT's -55.36%.

Which ETF is better, ITDF or DGT?

On 1-year performance, DGT leads with 25.40% vs 21.78% for ITDF. On fees, ITDF is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, DGT has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITDF or DGT?

Over the 1-year period, DGT has performed better with a 25.40% return vs 21.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITDF or DGT?

ITDF is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITDF or DGT?

DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.49% for ITDF.

What is the main difference between ITDF and DGT?

ITDF is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while DGT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDF and 0.50% for DGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.