PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDB vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDB achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.34% return.


ITDB

1D
0.16%
1M
1.96%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.87%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.39%
1M
4.62%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.27%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDB
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF
6.50%14.58%9.65%11.73%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.34%17.82%24.98%11.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDB and VOO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

0.87

The correlation between ITDB and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITDB vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITDB
VOO

Technology

26.0%
35.7%

Financial Services

14.9%
11.6%

Industrials

12.3%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.2%

Communication Services

8.0%
11.3%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.5%

Real Estate

5.4%
1.9%

Energy

4.6%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.8%

Utilities

3.8%
2.4%

Technology

ITDB
26.0%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

ITDB
14.9%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

ITDB
12.3%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ITDB
8.9%
VOO
10.2%

Communication Services

ITDB
8.0%
VOO
11.3%

Healthcare

ITDB
7.6%
VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

ITDB
5.4%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

ITDB
4.6%
VOO
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

ITDB
4.6%
VOO
4.9%

Basic Materials

ITDB
3.9%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

ITDB
3.8%
VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDB
ITDB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ITDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDB Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDBVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.23

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.83

15.03

-2.20

ITDB vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDB and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDBVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.44

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.94

0.89

+1.05

Drawdowns

ITDB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDB drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDB and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDBVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-33.99%

+25.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-8.90%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.32%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-3.69%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

1.91%

-0.63%

Volatility

ITDB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) is 2.45%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that ITDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDBVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.78%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

8.90%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

11.80%

-4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

16.81%

-8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.60%

18.00%

-9.40%

ITDB vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ITDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITDB
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF
1.92%2.05%1.96%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDB and VOO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to ITDB (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDB dropped -8.41% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 28.62% vs 16.43% for ITDB. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 28.62% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ITDB.

ITDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

ITDB is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ITDB and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDB and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer