ITB vs. SLV
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 13.64%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITB charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
ITB vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 13.64%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
ITB
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -12.12%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
ITB vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -3.80% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and SLV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006 | 0.14 |
ITB vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
SLV
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
SLV
-
Industrials
ITB
SLV
-
Basic Materials
ITB
SLV
Real Estate
ITB
SLV
-
Communication Services
ITB
-
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
SLV
-
Energy
ITB
-
SLV
-
Financial Services
ITB
-
SLV
-
Healthcare
ITB
-
SLV
-
Technology
ITB
-
SLV
-
Utilities
ITB
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
SLV
ITB vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.35 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 2.62 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 5.64 | -5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 1.89 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.58 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.49 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.25 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
ITB vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -76.28% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -42.45% | +16.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -42.45% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -42.45% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | -42.81% | -9.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.07% | -37.30% | +10.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.10% | -44.67% | +7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.09% | 19.67% | -6.58% |
Volatility
ITB vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) is 8.17%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that ITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | 16.30% | -8.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.42% | 58.31% | -37.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.47% | 58.90% | -29.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.19% | 36.15% | -6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 31.84% | -1.84% |
ITB vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.23% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and SLV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to ITB (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 13.64% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, ITB has been the lower-risk option at 8.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 13.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while SLV is Silver. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ITB and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer