PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITB vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ITB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ITB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
-5.79%-5.26%1.55%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.62%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.


ITB

1D
2.80%
1M
-15.62%
YTD
-5.79%
6M
-15.27%
1Y
-3.74%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
13.58%

IBIT

1D
1.96%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.62%
6M
-40.89%
1Y
-17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ITB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ITB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITB
ITB Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITBIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

-0.40

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

-0.29

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.97

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.39

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.28

-0.83

+0.56

ITB vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITB Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITB and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITBIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

-0.40

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.35

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between ITB and IBIT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ITB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
1.25%1.67%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ITB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ITBIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

-49.36%

-37.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.45%

-49.36%

+24.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.58%

-46.11%

+17.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.20%

-14.13%

-23.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.43%

23.09%

-12.66%

Volatility

ITB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) is 7.95%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that ITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ITBIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

12.99%

-5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

36.75%

-17.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.44%

45.42%

-14.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.08%

51.26%

-22.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.81%

51.26%

-21.45%