ITB vs. IBIT
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ITB returned 4.04% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITB charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
ITB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
ITB
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -12.12%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -3.80% | -5.26% | 1.55% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and IBIT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
IBIT
ITB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.86 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.79 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | -1.36 | +1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.89 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.30 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
ITB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -49.36% | -37.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -49.36% | +23.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.07% | -48.10% | +21.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.10% | -16.02% | -21.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.09% | 28.44% | -15.35% |
Volatility
ITB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) is 8.17%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that ITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | 9.50% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.42% | 34.44% | -14.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.47% | 43.73% | -14.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.19% | 50.19% | -21.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 50.19% | -20.19% |
ITB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.23% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and IBIT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ITB (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, ITB leads with 4.04% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ITB has been the lower-risk option at 8.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITB has performed better with a 4.04% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ITB.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ITB and 0.25% for IBIT.
ITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer