ITB vs. GOEX
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while GOEX is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 14.45%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for GOEX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.
Performance
ITB vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than GOEX's -10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed GOEX with an annualized return of 14.45%, while GOEX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.61% annualized return.
ITB
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- -5.10%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 7.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
GOEX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -9.61%
- 1Y
- 52.15%
- 3Y*
- 44.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
ITB vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.87% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -10.45% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and GOEX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010 | 0.18 |
ITB vs. GOEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
GOEX
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
GOEX
-
Industrials
ITB
GOEX
Basic Materials
ITB
GOEX
Real Estate
ITB
GOEX
-
Communication Services
ITB
-
GOEX
-
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
GOEX
-
Energy
ITB
-
GOEX
-
Financial Services
ITB
-
GOEX
-
Healthcare
ITB
-
GOEX
-
Technology
ITB
-
GOEX
-
Utilities
ITB
-
GOEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
GOEX
ITB vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.21 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 1.37 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 3.79 | -3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, roughly equal to the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and GOEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -88.83% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -39.64% | +13.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -39.64% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -47.16% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | -53.66% | +1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.53% | -33.91% | +10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -63.52% | +26.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.45% | 14.30% | -0.85% |
Volatility
ITB vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) is 9.26%, while Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that ITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 17.04% | -7.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.89% | 41.66% | -20.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.90% | 50.58% | -20.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.29% | 39.35% | -10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.05% | 40.12% | -10.07% |
ITB vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than GOEX's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.32% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.17% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and GOEX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to ITB (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs GOEX's -88.83%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 14.45% vs 12.61% for GOEX. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, ITB has been the lower-risk option at 9.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 14.45% return vs 12.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.
GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.17% for ITB.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while GOEX is Gold. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.65% for GOEX.
GOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and GOEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer