ITA vs. VPL
ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) and VPL (Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while VPL is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITA returned 15.34%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for VPL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITA charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VPL.
Performance
ITA vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITA achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 26.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ITA has outperformed VPL with an annualized return of 15.34%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.
ITA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
VPL
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 26.86%
- 6M
- 28.52%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
ITA vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.97% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 35.24% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 26.86% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | -15.20% | 1.10% | 16.65% | 18.16% | -14.40% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITA and VPL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ITA and VPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITA vs. VPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITA
VPL
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ITA
VPL
Technology
ITA
VPL
Basic Materials
ITA
-
VPL
Communication Services
ITA
-
VPL
Consumer Cyclical
ITA
-
VPL
Consumer Defensive
ITA
-
VPL
Energy
ITA
-
VPL
Financial Services
ITA
-
VPL
Healthcare
ITA
-
VPL
Real Estate
ITA
-
VPL
Utilities
ITA
-
VPL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITA vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank
ITA
VPL
ITA vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITA | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 3.56 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 13.60 | -8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITA vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITA drawdown since its inception was -59.72%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITA and VPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITA | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.72% | -55.49% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -13.33% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -16.35% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -31.09% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | -33.90% | -17.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -2.90% | -3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -11.62% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 3.49% | +2.48% |
Volatility
ITA vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) is 9.07%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that ITA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITA | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 10.01% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.47% | 18.75% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 21.26% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 17.67% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 17.47% | +5.75% |
ITA vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITA has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITA vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than VPL's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 2.80% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITA and VPL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPL has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to ITA (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITA dropped -59.72% vs VPL's -55.49%.
On 10-year performance, ITA leads with 15.34% vs 10.83% for VPL. On fees, VPL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ITA has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITA has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITA.
VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.46% for ITA.
ITA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while VPL is Asia Pacific Equities. ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITA and 0.08% for VPL.
VPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITA and VPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer