ITA vs. SMH
ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITA returned 15.34%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITA charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
ITA vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITA achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ITA has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.34%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
ITA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
ITA vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.97% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 35.24% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITA and SMH is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ITA and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITA vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITA
SMH
Industrials
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
ITA
SMH
-
Technology
ITA
SMH
Basic Materials
ITA
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
ITA
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITA
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
ITA
-
SMH
-
Energy
ITA
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
ITA
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
ITA
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
ITA
-
SMH
-
Utilities
ITA
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITA vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
ITA
SMH
ITA vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.60 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 9.18 | -7.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 33.74 | -28.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITA vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITA drawdown since its inception was -59.72%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITA and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.72% | -84.96% | +25.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -14.93% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -35.74% | +19.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -45.30% | +26.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | -45.30% | -5.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -2.81% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -41.04% | +31.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 4.06% | +1.91% |
Volatility
ITA vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) is 9.07%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that ITA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 16.25% | -7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.47% | 27.73% | -9.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 33.20% | -11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 35.47% | -15.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 32.82% | -9.60% |
ITA vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITA has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITA vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITA and SMH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to ITA (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITA dropped -59.72% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 15.34% for ITA. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ITA has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 15.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITA.
ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
ITA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while SMH is Semiconductors. ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITA and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITA and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer