ISZE vs. IAU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISZE (iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - ISZE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Risk Weighted Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISZE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.

Performance

ISZE vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF (ISZE) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ISZE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IAU

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 32.20%
• 3Y*: 31.29%
• 5Y*: 18.32%
• 10Y*: 13.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISZE vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISZE iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-0.11%	15.54%	-15.70%	8.17%	6.07%	21.17%	-13.91%	25.13%
IAU iShares Gold Trust	2.98%	63.95%	26.85%	12.84%	-0.63%	-4.00%	25.03%	17.98%	-1.76%	12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ISZE and IAU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.14

ISZE vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISZE	IAU
Industrials	20.0%	-
Financial Services	17.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	-
Basic Materials	8.2%	-
Technology	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	-
Healthcare	7.8%	-
Real Estate	6.0%	100.0%
Communication Services	5.6%	-
Utilities	4.8%	-
Energy	3.8%	-

Return for Risk

ISZE vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU

IAU Risk / Return Rank: 32
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISZE vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF (ISZE) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISZE	IAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.62	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ISZE	IAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-45.14%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-17.70%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-15.96%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ISZE	IAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	26.42%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.95%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.90%	—

ISZE vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISZE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISZE vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISZE nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IAU iShares Gold Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISZE iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.89%	6.63%	2.72%	8.47%	1.39%	2.24%	3.04%	3.33%	3.18%	1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISZE and IAU in my portfolio?

ISZE and IAU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ISZE or IAU?

On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISZE or IAU?

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISZE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISZE or IAU?

ISZE and IAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ISZE and IAU?

ISZE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IAU is Gold. ISZE tracks MSCI World ex USA Risk Weighted Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISZE and 0.25% for IAU.