PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISZE vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISZE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF (ISZE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ISZE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ACWI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.18%
6M
8.21%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
12.53%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$420.02M$465.87M$510.46M

ISZE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISZE
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%-0.11%15.54%-15.70%8.17%6.07%21.17%-13.91%25.13%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
11.28%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ISZE and ACWI is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.61

The correlation between ISZE and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISZE vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISZE
ACWI

Industrials

20.0%
10.8%

Financial Services

17.3%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
8.7%

Basic Materials

8.2%
3.4%

Technology

8.1%
32.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.7%

Healthcare

7.8%
8.3%

Real Estate

6.0%
1.6%

Communication Services

5.6%
8.0%

Utilities

4.8%
2.4%

Energy

3.8%
3.6%

Industrials

ISZE
20.0%
ACWI
10.8%

Financial Services

ISZE
17.3%
ACWI
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ISZE
10.7%
ACWI
8.7%

Basic Materials

ISZE
8.2%
ACWI
3.4%

Technology

ISZE
8.1%
ACWI
32.7%

Consumer Defensive

ISZE
7.9%
ACWI
4.7%

Healthcare

ISZE
7.8%
ACWI
8.3%

Real Estate

ISZE
6.0%
ACWI
1.6%

Communication Services

ISZE
5.6%
ACWI
8.0%

Utilities

ISZE
4.8%
ACWI
2.4%

Energy

ISZE
3.8%
ACWI
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISZE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISZE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISZE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF (ISZE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISZEACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

ISZE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISZE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISZEACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

Volatility

ISZE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISZEACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

ISZE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISZE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISZE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

ISZE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.44%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
ISZE
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%1.89%6.63%2.72%8.47%1.39%2.24%3.04%3.33%3.18%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISZE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISZE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISZE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for ISZE.

ISZE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. ISZE tracks MSCI World ex USA Risk Weighted Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISZE and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISZE and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer