ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L
ISXF.L (iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF) and XZE5.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - ISXF.L tracks the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR while XZE5.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISXF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XZE5.L.
Performance
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISXF.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- -1.41%
- 10Y*
- 1.39%
XZE5.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISXF.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF | -0.58% | 6.93% | -0.18% | 8.72% | -19.96% | -4.01% | 3.05% |
XZE5.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C | -0.42% | 8.64% | -0.59% | 3.12% | -1.52% | -6.82% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISXF.L and XZE5.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISXF.L
XZE5.L
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISXF.L | XZE5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISXF.L | XZE5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISXF.L | XZE5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.65% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | — | — |
Volatility
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISXF.L | XZE5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.77% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.92% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.28% | — | — |
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISXF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XZE5.L's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Dividend Comparison
ISXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while XZE5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISXF.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF | 4.54% | 4.23% | 3.97% | 3.15% | 2.93% | 2.31% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 2.87% | 2.87% | 3.48% | 1.95% |
XZE5.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISXF.L and XZE5.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XZE5.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XZE5.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISXF.L.
ISXF.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while XZE5.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISXF.L and 0.16% for XZE5.L.
Find the right allocation for ISXF.L and XZE5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer