PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ISXF.L

1D
0.33%
1M
2.17%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
-1.41%
10Y*
1.39%

XZE5.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ISXF.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF
-0.58%6.93%-0.18%8.72%-19.96%-4.01%3.05%
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
-0.42%8.64%-0.59%3.12%-1.52%-6.82%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ISXF.L and XZE5.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISXF.L
ISXF.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ISXF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

XZE5.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISXF.LXZE5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISXF.LXZE5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISXF.LXZE5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

Volatility

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISXF.LXZE5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.28%

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISXF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XZE5.L's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISXF.L vs. XZE5.L - Dividend Comparison

ISXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while XZE5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISXF.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF
4.54%4.23%3.97%3.15%2.93%2.31%2.30%2.66%2.87%2.87%3.48%1.95%
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISXF.L and XZE5.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZE5.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZE5.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISXF.L.

ISXF.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while XZE5.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISXF.L and 0.16% for XZE5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISXF.L and XZE5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer