PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XZE5.L is traded in GBP, while IEAA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEAA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XZE5.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IEAA.L

1D
0.25%
1M
1.01%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
-0.42%8.64%-0.59%3.12%-1.52%-6.82%-0.17%
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.18%8.62%-0.44%5.36%-8.93%-6.97%1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XZE5.L and IEAA.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.77

The correlation between XZE5.L and IEAA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZE5.L

IEAA.L
IEAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZE5.LIEAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

Drawdowns

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZE5.LIEAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

Volatility

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZE5.LIEAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.91%

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZE5.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IEAA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZE5.L vs. IEAA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZE5.L nor IEAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZE5.L and IEAA.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZE5.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZE5.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IEAA.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XZE5.L and 0.20% for IEAA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZE5.L and IEAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer