PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L) and Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (IGCB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XZE5.L is traded in GBP, while IGCB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IGCB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XZE5.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IGCB.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.78%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.09%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
-0.42%8.64%-0.59%3.12%-1.52%-6.82%-0.17%
IGCB.L
Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.24%6.83%1.93%9.20%-18.57%-4.00%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XZE5.L and IGCB.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.25

The correlation between XZE5.L and IGCB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZE5.L

IGCB.L
IGCB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IGCB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L) and Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (IGCB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZE5.LIGCB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

Drawdowns

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZE5.LIGCB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

Volatility

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZE5.LIGCB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.73%

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZE5.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than IGCB.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZE5.L vs. IGCB.L - Dividend Comparison

XZE5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGCB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IGCB.L
Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
5.27%5.18%5.18%4.26%2.54%1.74%1.22%
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZE5.L and IGCB.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGCB.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGCB.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZE5.L.

XZE5.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while IGCB.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XZE5.L and 0.10% for IGCB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZE5.L and IGCB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer