PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISXF.L is traded in GBP, while IEAA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEAA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISXF.L achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than IEAA.L's -0.18% return.


ISXF.L

1D
0.33%
1M
2.17%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
-1.41%
10Y*
1.39%

IEAA.L

1D
0.25%
1M
1.01%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISXF.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF
-0.58%6.93%-0.18%8.72%-19.96%-4.01%8.54%11.27%-2.05%1.94%
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.18%8.62%-0.44%5.36%-8.93%-6.97%8.50%0.21%-0.51%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ISXF.L and IEAA.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2017

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISXF.L
ISXF.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ISXF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISXF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

IEAA.L
IEAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISXF.LIEAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.25

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

3.22

-0.48

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISXF.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISXF.L and IEAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISXF.LIEAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.96

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.04

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.09

+0.44

Drawdowns

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISXF.L drawdown since its inception was -32.38%, which is greater than IEAA.L's maximum drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISXF.L and IEAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISXF.LIEAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.38%

-21.43%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.73%

-3.75%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.73%

-3.75%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.23%

-16.80%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.65%

-5.98%

-5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-8.94%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.46%

+0.21%

Volatility

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) at 1.67%. This indicates that ISXF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISXF.LIEAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

1.67%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

3.74%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

4.90%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.92%

6.31%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.28%

6.91%

+0.37%

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ISXF.L and IEAA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISXF.L vs. IEAA.L - Dividend Comparison

ISXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while IEAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISXF.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF
4.54%4.23%3.97%3.15%2.93%2.31%2.30%2.66%2.87%2.87%3.48%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISXF.L and IEAA.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISXF.L and IEAA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

ISXF.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while IEAA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISXF.L and IEAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer