ISVL vs. ECML

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISVL (iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF) and ECML (EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. ISVL is passively managed, while ECML is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISVL returned 21.34%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for ECML. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISVL charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ECML.

Performance

ISVL vs. ECML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISVL achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than ECML's 14.39% return.

ISVL

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 28.37%
• 3Y*: 21.34%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: —

ECML

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 14.39%
• 6M: 14.23%
• 1Y: 26.84%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISVL vs. ECML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF	8.45%	42.84%	4.58%	9.37%
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	14.39%	6.82%	2.37%	24.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ISVL and ECML is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023	0.61

The correlation between ISVL and ECML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISVL vs. ECML - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISVL	ECML
Industrials	23.3%	14.2%
Financial Services	20.8%	-
Real Estate	11.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	23.8%
Basic Materials	9.1%	10.6%
Energy	7.3%	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	12.4%
Technology	4.7%	5.3%
Healthcare	3.7%	16.6%
Communication Services	3.0%	3.9%
Utilities	1.5%	1.4%

Return for Risk

ISVL vs. ECML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISVL

ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 54
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ECML

ECML Risk / Return Rank: 61
ECML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ECML Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ECML Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ECML Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ECML Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISVL vs. ECML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISVL	ECML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.86	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.85	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	3.85	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	11.05	-2.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISVL vs. ECML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the ECML Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISVL and ECML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISVL	ECML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	1.86	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.86	-0.16

Drawdowns

ISVL vs. ECML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISVL drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, which is greater than ECML's maximum drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVL and ECML.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISVL	ECML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	-24.66%	-5.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.48%	-7.01%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.93%	-24.66%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-0.27%	-1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.66%	-5.88%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	2.44%	+0.74%

Volatility

ISVL vs. ECML - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) at 3.84%. This indicates that ISVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISVL	ECML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	3.84%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	9.75%	+2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.47%	14.56%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	18.39%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.78%	18.39%	-1.61%

ISVL vs. ECML - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISVL has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ECML's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISVL vs. ECML - Dividend Comparison

ISVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than ECML's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	1.20%	1.38%	0.98%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF	2.48%	2.69%	3.92%	3.82%	3.37%	2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISVL and ECML in my portfolio?

ISVL and ECML have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISVL or ECML?

ISVL has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to ECML (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISVL dropped -30.48% vs ECML's -24.66%.

Which ETF is better, ISVL or ECML?

On 3-year performance, ISVL leads with 21.34% vs 15.57% for ECML. On fees, ISVL is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ECML has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISVL or ECML?

Over the 3-year period, ISVL has performed better with a 21.34% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISVL or ECML?

ISVL is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ECML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISVL or ECML?

ISVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.20% for ECML.

What is the main difference between ISVL and ECML?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Euclidean. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISVL and 0.95% for ECML.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.