PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISVL vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISVL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ISVL having a 9.65% return and DGRO slightly lower at 9.64%.


ISVL

1D
1.10%
1M
1.96%
YTD
9.65%
6M
13.29%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISVL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
9.65%42.84%4.58%17.56%-13.69%7.69%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.64%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%18.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ISVL and DGRO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.70

The correlation between ISVL and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISVL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISVL
DGRO

Industrials

23.3%
10.8%

Financial Services

20.8%
21.2%

Real Estate

11.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
5.7%

Basic Materials

9.1%
2.5%

Energy

7.3%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
11.5%

Technology

4.7%
19.4%

Healthcare

3.7%
16.4%

Communication Services

3.0%
0.1%

Utilities

1.5%
6.9%

Industrials

ISVL
23.3%
DGRO
10.8%

Financial Services

ISVL
20.8%
DGRO
21.2%

Real Estate

ISVL
11.1%
DGRO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISVL
10.4%
DGRO
5.7%

Basic Materials

ISVL
9.1%
DGRO
2.5%

Energy

ISVL
7.3%
DGRO
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

ISVL
5.3%
DGRO
11.5%

Technology

ISVL
4.7%
DGRO
19.4%

Healthcare

ISVL
3.7%
DGRO
16.4%

Communication Services

ISVL
3.0%
DGRO
0.1%

Utilities

ISVL
1.5%
DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISVL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISVL
ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISVL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISVLDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.71

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

14.33

-5.17

ISVL vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISVL Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISVL and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISVLDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.53

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.78

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.77

-0.06

Drawdowns

ISVL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISVL drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVL and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISVLDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-35.10%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-6.47%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-14.03%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-19.31%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

0.00%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-3.44%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

1.67%

+1.51%

Volatility

ISVL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that ISVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISVLDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.24%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

6.94%

+5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

9.49%

+4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

13.82%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.62%

+0.16%

ISVL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISVL has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISVL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

ISVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
2.45%2.69%3.92%3.82%3.37%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISVL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISVL has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISVL dropped -30.48% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.72% vs 10.31% for ISVL. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISVL.

ISVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.94% for DGRO.

ISVL is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ISVL tracks FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISVL and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISVL and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer