ISVBF vs. MCH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH).

ISVBF and MCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISVBF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. MCH is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Jul 13, 2022.

Performance

ISVBF vs. MCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ISVBF vs. MCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	-6.48%	30.64%	18.96%	-9.28%	-15.63%
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	-6.13%	30.20%	17.32%	-19.91%	-3.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISVBF achieves a -6.48% return, which is significantly lower than MCH's -6.13% return.

ISVBF

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -4.98%
• YTD: -6.48%
• 6M: -13.49%
• 1Y: 6.38%
• 3Y*: 8.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MCH

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -6.56%
• YTD: -6.13%
• 6M: -11.68%
• 1Y: 10.36%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISVBF vs. MCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISVBF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MCH's 0.79% expense ratio.

MCH

Matthews China Active ETF

ISVBF

iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ISVBF vs. MCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISVBF

ISVBF Risk / Return Rank: 17
ISVBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ISVBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ISVBF Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ISVBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ISVBF Martin Ratio Rank: 17

MCH

MCH Risk / Return Rank: 24
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISVBF vs. MCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISVBF	MCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	0.44	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	0.74	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.10	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	0.61	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.98	1.90	-0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISVBF vs. MCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISVBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the MCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISVBF and MCH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISVBF	MCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	0.44	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.10	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between ISVBF and MCH is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ISVBF vs. MCH - Dividend Comparison

ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	1.88%	1.76%	1.31%	1.62%

Drawdowns

ISVBF vs. MCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISVBF drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, which is greater than MCH's maximum drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVBF and MCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISVBF	MCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.78%	-40.53%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.18%	-17.61%	-1.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.20%	-12.80%	-11.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-19.06%	-14.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.49%	5.64%	+0.85%

Volatility

ISVBF vs. MCH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) has a higher volatility of 17.49% compared to Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) at 6.96%. This indicates that ISVBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISVBF	MCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.49%	6.96%	+10.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.96%	14.52%	+10.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.35%	23.81%	+7.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.03%	29.85%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.03%	29.85%	+0.18%